On Channel Surfing, Circus Acts, and Time Passages

On Channel Surfing, Circus Acts, and Time Passages

February 21, 2019

by Doug “Uncola” Lynn:

It’s been another strange week as the circus continues. On Sunday February 17, 2019 former acting FBI Director, Andrew McCabe, told interviewer Scott Pelly on “60 Minutes” that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, in early 2017, broached the idea of using the 25th Amendment as a means to remove newly elected President Donald J. Trump.  Furthermore, McCabe said in that interview Rosenstein was actually “counting votes” in Trump’s cabinet to pull off what Republican Senator Lindsay Graham of South Carolina has termed an “administrative coup”.

All very interesting; especially, given the fact Rosenstein has publically denied McCabe’s claims.

When Pelley asked McCabe why the counterintelligence investigation on Trump was “specifically” launched, McCabe responded as follows:

It’s many of those same concerns that cause us to be concerned about a national security threat. And the idea is, if the president committed obstruction of justice, fired the director of the of the FBI to negatively impact or to shut down our investigation of Russia’s malign activity and possibly in support of his campaign, as a counterintelligence investigator you have to ask yourself, “Why would a president of the United States do that?” So all those same sorts of facts cause us to wonder is there an inappropriate relationship, a connection between this president and our most fearsome enemy, the government of Russia?

Why would a president of the United States fire James Comey? Because Rod Rosenstein advised the President to fire the FBI Director in a memorandum dated May 9, 2017.  Therein, Rosenstein answered the question floating around in McCabe’s head: To restore public confidence in the FBI.   And why did Comey need to be removed in order to restore public confidence? According to Rosenstein in that memorandum:  “The way the Director [Comey] handled the conclusion of the [Hillary Clinton] email investigation was wrong.”

So, Rod Rosenstein, the guy who actually signed off on at least one of the FISA warrants to spy on Trump’s campaign, who wanted Trump removed via the 25th Amendment, who advised the new President to fire Comey, then in the aftermath, hired his fellow Clinton Uranium One co-conspirator, Robert Mueller, to illegally investigate Trump.   Indeed, Mueller’s investigation is illegal because it originated as a counter-intelligence investigation and with no specific criminal investigation resulting in a blatant violation of the special counsel statute of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.

So why aren’t all these people in jail?

Good question.

Instead, as the nation is fixated on government gridlock and walls on America’s southern border, Mueller will be allowed to finalize his report, upend the lives of Trump’s former inner-circle over process crimes within an investigation that should have never been allowed in the first place; and all while James Comey and Andrew McCabe round the talk show circuits to promote their respective books.

At the same time, U.S. debt has reached an all-time high, a law signed by Trump in 2017 comes into effect this year that allows law enforcement, including the FBI, to “routinely take DNA samples from people who are arrested but not yet convicted of a crime”, and while the Trump administration launches a global initiative to make homosexuality legal in all the nations of the world.

Moreover, as Comey and McCabe enjoy their respective book tours, Trump has decided to start a war in Venezuela to secure the citizens of that nation from the alleged aggressions of Cuban health care professionals;  as whistleblowers claim Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is spearheading the transfer  of “sensitive U.S. nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia in potential violation of the Atomic Energy Act”.

Kushner’s securing radioactive energy for the Saudis does, indeed, seem peculiar given his forthcoming middle-east “peace tour” to promote peace in the middle-east via “a negotiated solution between Israel and the Palestinians”. Very peculiar indeed.  Or perhaps not, coming from a guy whose address is 666 Park Avenue in Manhattan.

Some of this was addressed in the commentary of this blogger’s most recent article “As the Games Begin whereupon questions were raised as to whom exactly is currently in charge.

In the opening of the movie “The Departed”, Jack Nicholson’s character speaks of how it took time for Irish-Catholics to win the White House via the election of John F. Kennedy, before saying something to effect of:

No one gives it to ya.  Ya have to take it“.

Can there be any doubt, whatsoever, that someone has taken over America?  Whoever it is, it’s not the Deplorables; even if some of them may remain under that delusion.

And, whoever it is, those in control have been in place for far longer than most people realize.

In a letter said to have been sent to Colonial William F. Elkins in November 1864, President Abraham Lincoln is claimed to have written the following:

I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.

In his 1913 book entitled “The New Freedom”, the 28th President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, wrote this:

Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.

On January 17, 1961, former President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his farewell address to the nation, stated the following:

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Exactly 100 days after Ike’s farewell, on April 27, 1961, John F. Kennedy spoke before the American Newspaper Publishers Association in an address that later became known as his “Secret Society” speech. In that address, he stated the following:

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence: on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.  Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed– and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.

Thirty months after that speech, President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963.

What Lincoln foresaw, worried Wilson, of which Eisenhower warned, that killed Kennedy.

In using mixed-martial-arts terminology here – assuming the triangle chokehold was completed near six-decades ago, to the point of a Dark Circle of Power assassinating a U.S. president and getting away with the crime; and assuming they have only consolidated their iron grip on the U.S. since then:  Is it possible Donald Trump may be merely another political punch by a hidden-hand?

Who are they, anyway?

Could there be different groups vying for the top penthouses of the pyramid of power? Or is there only one occult group peering from behind the eye in the top of the pyramid?

The word “occult” is an apt way to identify the group, or groups, in control because Merriam-Webster defines “occult” via terms like “cover”, “eclipse”, “secret”, “abstruse”, “mysterious”, and “concealed”.   The word also fits the way many have defined the elusive elite as well, with names like illuminati, luciferians, satanists, freemasons, et al.  And still others call them, the Deep State, round-table participants, globalists, bankers, and by many other names.

There are also those who claim to have identified the Israeli Lobby as the Deep State, and the occultist powerbrokers as consisting of Zionists, and Jews; particularly Jews of Ashkenazi and Khazarian descent.  Supposedly these two tribes are genetically very closely related; as two subgroups of the same European stock.

Some claim the Khazars hijacked the freemasons while others believe they actually descended from freemason lines dating all the way back to ancient Egypt and Babylon. The point is that many see patterns of these so-called “Jewish” influences throughout all of the top tiers of society ranging from politics, to Hollywood, to media, banking, and Silicon Valley tech firms.

Simply do an internet search of “jews politics media” and then hit the “images” tab to see all of the patterns and connections; including a quote from American automobile titan, Henry Ford, Sr., who believed Jews controlled the “world’s sources  of news” and that their “oppression” of people by their “financial practices” were never “given publicity”.

Today, some believe it is Talmudic Jews in control and others who also believe it is the Hasidic Jews of the Chabad.   In truth, the Chabad movement has enjoyed much growth over the past seven decades among Jews and now counts over eight million devotees throughout eighty countries.  But are the Hasids in control of the banks at the top of the pyramid?

It’s doubtful, but anything is possible.

In any event, just know many have identifed Jews as the occult group in control of the world and Judaism as a satanic cult; even dating back centuries.  In fact, the Bible’s Book of Revelation in both chapter 2, verse 9 and chapter 3, verse 9 refer to “the synagogue of Satan” that “say they are Jews, and are not”.  Which is interesting in light of DNA tests showing the majority of European Jews as descending from prehistoric European women and not the tribes of ancient Israel.

So is it accurate to conflate the Jews, the Torah, and the Ten Commandments to luciferianism?  Because, in the opinion of this blogger, it appears luciferian indoctrination suberts multiple ideologies in obvious ways; and not exactly via the tenets of Judaism, per se.

Consider, for example, Billy Corgan, the lead singer for the alternative rock band “Smashing Pumpkins”. Below is a 1-hour-long program showing the songwriter during a 2012 interview with Infowars host Alex Jones. There, Corgan appears very intelligent and articulate as he discusses liberty, government authoritarianism, corporate collectivism, globalism, and free speech:

Next, is a 47-minute video by Truthstream Media that was posted on January 15, 2019 regarding the Luciferian indoctrination of society.  Now the entire video is worthwhile, but in the interest of time and to make a point, I would refer the reader to the 5-minute segment from the 15:57 mark to the 20:50 mark. In this portion, the new, enlightened, Billy Corgan is revealed during a 2018 summer concert, and…. well…. you just have to see it to believe it.


(View Billy Corgan segment from 15:57 to 20:50 minutes)

Did the Dark Powers get to Corgan? Is he under duress? Or has he been fully indoctrinated by a form of spiritual hypnosis? In any case, Corgan’s conversion appears to defy most conventional religious ideologies; including Torah-based Judaism.

The lead singer of the Smashing Pumpkins now appears to consider himself as a god.

And if that were possible, what isn’t?

In fact, with that kind of magic voodoo transitioning someone like Corgan into a satanic clown, then why would President Donald J. Trump be immune; especially given the increased stakes of worldwide power?

It is, therefore, no surprise there are those who believe President Donald Trump is the tip of the spear of an international crime syndicate.  Or, rather, some believe Trump to be like Walter White’s “Heisenberg” in the hit TV series, “Breaking Bad”, as:  The danger”, the “one who knocks”.

According to a 2017 article in The New Republic:

Whether Trump knew it or not, Russian mobsters and corrupt oligarchs used his properties not only to launder vast sums of money from extortion, drugs, gambling, and racketeering, but even as a base of operations for their criminal activities. In the process, they propped up Trump’s business and enabled him to reinvent his image. Without the Russian mafia, it is fair to say, Donald Trump would not be president of the United States.

To be fair, Win McCormack, owner of The New Republic, hails from a banking family and was one of Hillary Clinton’s biggest benefactors. Even so, that article sums up what many of Trump’s so called opponents believe.  Furthermore, if there were any truth to any of it at all, then one would think Special Counsel Robert Mueller would now have the evidence after two years of unimpeded investigation of Trump’s affairs.

And there are reports by CNN and The Washington Post Mueller’s report could come out as soon as next week.

So what if Mueller provides evidence as delineated in The New Republic article?

What if Mueller doesn’t?

Now a more important question: What if Mueller was a ruse all along?

Either Trump is real and Mueller is real or they are both psyops delivering a predetermined outcome.   And the only outcome this blogger could imagine at this time would be for the theatrics of starting a civil war and engaging the 2nd Amendment crowd as the last hurdle to America’s demise.

A trick as foreshadowed in the 1927 German film Metropolis.

This film derived from the new freedoms granted by the Weimar Republic which also inspired wellsprings of innovation in science, art, education and culture during that era.  From Freudian psychoanalysis, to the birth of the Frankfurt School; advancements in quantum mechanics like Werner Heisenberg’s Uncertainty principle to Albert Einstein’s Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921.  During this time great contributions were additionally made in the fields of architecture, literature, and cinema; all under the umbrella of German Expressionism.

It was in 1927, when the German expressionist, Fritz Lang, released the seemingly prophetic “Metropolis”; a film set in the year 2026, when society is separated into two distinct classes known as the Workers and the Thinkers.  The Workers lived and worked to operate the machines in an underground hell of impoverished enslavement while under total surveillance.

Conversely, the Thinkers led lives of absolute technocratic luxury above ground in gleaming skyscrapers.  The leader of the thinkers controlled the world in what was called “The New Tower of Babel” and he commissioned the creation of an android (called “Machine Man”) that had the capability to appear exactly like any human person. The android was used to trick the Workers into revolting against the establishment so the Thinkers could, in turn, violently subdue the lower classes once and for all.

Paradoxically, there are those today who find the film permeated with occult undertones and still resonating within the Hollywood film and American music industries.

The moral of the story for Metropolis could be summarized by its silent white-block letters upon the black screen at the end:




For which a 2010 article on TheVigilantCitizen.com identified the “mediator” as electronic media:

The moral of the story of Metropolis is not “let’s abolish all inequities and rebuild a world where everyone is equal” and it is certainly not “let’s be democratic and vote for who we want as a ruler.” It is more “let’s send the workers back to the depths where they belong, but with the addition of a mediator, who will be the link between the workers and the thinkers”. So, when all is said and done, the movie is intrinsically “elitist,” as it still calls for the existence of an elite group of people holding most of the resources and managing a working class. In the end, the workers … were duped, believing that their conditions would change. In fact, the status-quo remained and….  resulting in tighter surveillance and control.

…. Media is the mediator. That is its function.

What better way to mediate than with a reality TV president? For we’ve become a society soothed by cacophonous crowd-noise and laugh-tracks and neon colors shining through electronic screens; rainbow static like shadows on Plato’s cave. We imbibe suggestions, identify patterns, connect the dots, and draw conclusions.  This is, after all, how narratives move entire populations, like marketplaces, in the modern world.

All of which raises two phrases that endlessly flash like neon signs on opposite sides of the road to hellfire and damnation:




Is Donald Trump truly warring against Marxists intent on global hegemony?

Or, is he the “danger” delivering his supporters on a political platter?

Regardless, the circus won’t end until it’s time to shut it all down.  Until then, the bizarre acts will continue to count down like clockwork.

There remains the possibility we are witnessing a deception so grand as to make Donald J. Trump one of the most sinister, clever, and evil bastards in world history; not to mention one of the greatest theatrical ringleaders of all time.

And if that were possible, what isn’t?

7 thoughts on “On Channel Surfing, Circus Acts, and Time Passages

  1. “. . . is he the “danger” delivering his supporters on a political platter?” I think that is THE question of questions in regards to Trump; on display for all to see is the on-going inequality of protection under the law that, as yet, remains to be resolved; bankers, regardless of ethnicity, fill his cabinet positions, and we continue, regardless of “draw-down goals”, to have our military present in nations that are no threat to us (for the cause of freedom AND corporate profits). He supports civil asset forfeiture and red flag laws, so he is no advocate for due process but FOR presumption of guilt, and, (which aligns with the observation that he “is the one who knocks”), who is to say that the wall is not meant to keep us in?

    And IF he keeps the campaign promise and it is built, and IF it turns out, even in the future of some other administration, to be OUR wall, then, well . . . we elected to be imprisoned.


  2. Your articles burst with clarity as a windshield wiper clears away muddled images on the outside at the same time the blowing heat clears away the fog from within. To paraphrase the iconic singer and lyricist, Mike Love, Catch a wave; you’ll be sitting on top of the world. The feeling I get each time I catch one of your articles.

    When I begin to read one of your essay-articles, I have the anticipation that even though I’m not sure where you are taking me, I’m going to learn alot along the way.

    I hope you are not an atheist. Satan blinds the heart and soul, the way his media numbs the intellect. I count you as one of the immune.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s