Hunger for the Blackjack Agenda

Hunger for the Blackjack Agenda

October 26, 2016,

by Uncola:

The French philosopher Voltaire once said: “Each player must accept the cards life deals him or her: but once they are in hand, he or she alone must decide how to play the cards in order to win the game.” The American author and newspaperman, Finley Peter Dunne, once advised: “Trust everybody, but cut the cards.” The country singer, Kenny Rogers said we should: “Know when to hold them and know when to fold them; and the musical pop princess, Lady Gaga, sings of how: “He can’t read my poker face”.

This is what comes to mind when reading about the Two Faces of Hillary Clinton in the New York Times. I must admit, when reading articles like this one, I am forced to pinch myself just to make sure I am still living in the here and now instead of having just awakened like Rip Van Winkle in a dismally Dantean, dystopian world of the future. In response to recent Wikileaks revelations, the article explains why it is necessary for the Harpy to have one face in public and another in her private political dealings. In this fine example of Orwellian Newspeak, the author of the piece, Jonathan Rauch, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, writes in his best poker face in order to deplorably deal out this despicable diamond:

“In politics, hypocrisy and doublespeak are tools.”

Well butter my butt and call me toast. Lord, I must be naïve. Because, according to their Wikipedia page The Brookings Institution is:

a century-old American research group on Think Tank Row in Washington, D.C. Its stated mission is to “provide innovative and practical recommendations that advance three broad goals: strengthen American democracy; foster the economic and social welfare, security and opportunity of all Americans; and secure a more open, safe, prosperous, and cooperative international system.

Obviously, according to senior fellow and card-counterfeiting cad, Mr. Rauch, the “social welfare, security and opportunity of all Americans” means bluffing the citizens into accepting that a 2 of clubs plus a 2 of spades equals a 5 of hearts.   In other words, 2 + 2 = 5 and we should just trust the Government and allow Big Brother to deal out the “Doublethink” defined in George Orwell’s classic book, “1984” as:

the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.

It is no wonder Orwell is not widely read in schools today. Instead of cautioning younger generations against the perils of jackboots stomping on human faces forever, they are, instead, being programmed to accept “new and improved” apocalyptic futures like the Hunger Games series which is famous for blessing its characters by the following benediction.

“May the odds be ever in your favor.”

For anyone unfamiliar with adolescent dystopian fiction, or for those living in caves since 2008, they may not recognize this hopeful catchphrase from the Hunger Games trilogy written by Suzanne Collins. The New York Times best-selling books sold over 65 million copies in the U.S. and has been printed in 51 different languages. The subsequent series of four movies were released between 2012 and 2015 and grossed a total of $2.9 billion worldwide.

The Hunger Game series chronicles the totalitarian state of Panem, a fictional North American post-apocalyptic scientific dictatorship where the extravagant elite lead luxurious lives of high society in a shining citadel of fortified power while the workers, plebs and serfs all suffer in abject poverty throughout twelve prison districts. The various regions of Panem are located within the former geographical footprints of the United States and Canada. Ironically, Panem comes from the Latin phrase panem et circenses, or “bread and circuses”, which according to Merriam-Webster is a “provision of the means of life and recreation by government to appease discontent”. Sound familiar? Even more ironic is how Hunger Games appears to be the fulfillment of existing United Nations global decrees on one side of the equation while proving to be quite prophetic on the other.

For example, the twelve districts of Panem are eerily similar to the ten super regions that were signed into being by President Richard Nixon on February 14, 1972 via Executive Order # 11647 upon the United Nations ratification of the original resolution. These ten super regions today have since parenthetically transitioned under the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and are continually evolving in combination with the “12 highway segments added as high priority corridors” under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

Regarding the prophetic aspects of Hunger Games, one simply has to view the films to see armed aerial drones guarding government confiscated lands; freedoms denied by a wealthy, tyrannical capitol city; and “stack and pack” population centers governed via the iron fist of a police state.

It is also interesting to note how fans from both sides of the political spectrum have equally embraced Hunger Games, even using the series to challenge the perceived misguided beliefs of their opponents. In fact, the universal appeal of the story is perhaps the main reason for the overwhelming financial success of the series. Entire articles have been written regarding how ardent fans of Hunger Games often make for “strange bedfellows” as follows:

Occupy Wall Streeters and liberals see “The Hunger Games” only as a condemnation of economic inequality and social injustice: poverty, pollution, police brutality. Ironically, they tend to see the solution in precisely the place where conservatives see the problem: big, left-wing government.

Paradoxically however, others believe Hunger Games to be nothing less than pre-planned psychological programming designed to transition the masses into accepting the Agenda 21 plan for a global-fascist dictatorship. They claim:

The world of The Hunger Games is already well on the way to fruition unless humanity has a fundamental reassessment of reality.


The foundations, structure and ‘must haves’ of a Hunger Games society are detailed in a plan being imposed through the United Nations called Agenda 21, which encompasses two related themes of ‘sustainable development’ and ‘biodiversity’. Sustainable development – as in don’t use more than can be replaced – sounds sensible enough at first until you realize what this and biodiversity really mean in the context of this conspiracy.

For those who may be unfamiliar with the global initiative that is Agenda 21, Wikipedia describes it as:

a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development. It is a product of the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels. The “21” in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st Century.

In the book, “Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse Of Global Transformation”, the author and economist, Patrick M. Wood, addresses the Agenda 21 deception by exposing the “Lexicon of Technocracy” that dates all the way back to the 1930’s and consisting of terms such as: “Sustainable Development”, “Green Economy” and “Smart Growth”. These terms, while utilized ostensibly to conserve and preserve the environment of planet earth, actually represent nothing less than a “resource grab” by the economic and political global elite.

In his book, as well as various online forums, Wood describes how Barack Obama has invoked the obscure 1906 Antiquities Act to grab 265 million acres from states, privately held individuals and companies; which is more than any other U.S. president in history. In a chilling manner, Wood outlines how, under the guise of preservation for future generations, the Dark Powers That Be are actually stealing lands that are loaded with resources including minerals, metals and timber that could be used for various agricultural purposes, to help pay down the national debt or to provide jobs that would benefit middle class families. Instead, however, these areas have been sealed off and not even allowed to be used by U.S. citizens for hunting or recreation.

Through the ruse of various .gov agencies, over 36% of the entire United States land mass, or 836.5 million acres, has been confiscated as follows:

  • Bureau of Land Management – 247.3 million acres
  • Fish and Game – 89.1 million acres
  • Forest Service – 197.1 million acres
  • National Park Service – 84 million acres
  • 109 million acres of wilderness areas
  • 110 million acres of wetlands

But wait, there’s more. What about the water? According to the United States Clean Water Restoration Act of 2010, Senate Bill # SW.787, it says:

The term “waters of the United States” means all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, the territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, natural ponds, and all impoundments of the foregoing, to the fullest extent that these waters, or activities affecting these waters, are subject to the legislative power of Congress under the Constitution.

In other words, your benign government now owns every drop of water ever rained but is kind enough to let you have a drink, rinse off your face, douche your lawn and wash your car. Isn’t that generous of them?



But what do the 2016 presidential candidates have to say about all this? Well, Donald Trump has weighed in and is on record as having absolutely no concern regarding holes in the Ozone layer, whatsoever, and even jokingly alludes it all might be a conspiracy against hair spray.

Hillary Clinton, however? Well, that is an entirely different matter. In her own words the Harpy not only believes women should lead the efforts in “sustainability”, but America must carry the environmental torch as well.

Remember, whenever you hear the word “sustainability”, just think “regulation” or “control”.

Moreover, on her website you will read how:

On day one, Hillary Clinton will set bold, national goals that will be achieved within 10 years of taking office: Generate enough renewable energy to power every home in America, with half a billion solar panels installed by the end of Hillary’s first term. Cut energy waste in American homes, schools, hospitals and offices by a third and make American manufacturing the cleanest and most efficient in the world. Reduce American oil consumption by a third through cleaner fuels and more efficient cars, boilers, ships, and trucks.


Hillary’s plan will deliver on the pledge President Obama made at the Paris climate conference—without relying on climate deniers in Congress to pass new legislation. She will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 30 percent in 2025 relative to 2005 levels and put the country on a path to cut emissions more than 80 percent by 2050.

Furthermore, according to recent Wikileaks data dumps, it appears one of Hillary’s private faces believes in a:

hemispheric common market with free trade and open borders,

While another leaked transcript shows another of the Harpy’s private faces which claimed, during an October, 2013 speech to Goldman Sachs, that:

those who oppose dramatic expansions to immigration are fundamentally un-American.

Additionally, the Harpy has called for a 550% increase in the resettlement of Syrian refugees in America which is much more than even Obama’s vastly increased level of more than 12,000 resettled annually. This, in spite of the fact that 83% of Americans want to see immigration levels frozen or reduced according to Pew Research Center.

The aforementioned author and economist Patrick Wood has this to say regarding Hillary:

She’s totally in line with the U.N. agenda, on board with everything they do,

Wood also describes Clinton’s proposed $135 billion “Breaking Every Barrier” program to transform America’s cities:

In this plan, she (Hillary) makes 37 pledges promising everything from removal of blight to construction of affordable housing in areas that are currently out of the price range of refugees, immigrants, the chronically unemployed and under-employed. She intends to build on the “successes” of her husband and the Obama administration in using public-private partnerships to transform cities. Obama’s contribution in this area included his Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, which forces grant-receiving cities to infuse their low-crime suburban areas, deemed “too white,” with subsidized housing marketed to low-income renters.

 Wood goes on to say:

She’s making a pre-announcement here that she’s going to follow the U.N. agenda. She’s signaling to her fellow globalists that she’s 100 percent on board with their agenda.

In September, 2015 a global sustainability summit was held in New York where the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda plan was put into place. In September, 2016 its actual implementation went into effect and is called the U.N. Conference on Housing and Sustainable Development or the “Habitat III” for short. With the focus on the world’s cities, Habitat III was attended by over 50,000 people including more than 200 mayors and 140 city delegations.

According to Wood:

So these people are viewing cities as the key ingredient right now to implementing sustainable development, and they say this battle for sustainability will be won or lost in the cities. And the U.N. document goes on to state that this agenda is “the first step for operationalizing sustainable development in an integrated and coordinated way at the global, national, subnational, and local levels. In essence, it’s a roadmap to global governance where American cities will no longer get their direction from elected officials representing them on the city council, or even the state legislature, but the United Nations itself. The local councils will likely not even know that the rules they are following in order to qualify for federal grants are tied to United Nations’ standards for sustainability.

A “roadmap to global governance” indeed. This month, October, 2016, the September 10, 2016 HABITAT III “NEW URBAN AGENDA” draft was adopted in Quito, Ecuador with its first two items boldly stating:

  1. We, the Heads of State and Government, Ministers and High Representatives, have gathered at the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) from 17 to 20 October 2016 in Quito, Ecuador, with the participation of sub-national and local governments, parliamentarians, civil society, indigenous peoples and local communities, the private sector, professionals and practitioners, the scientific and academic community, and other relevant stakeholders, to adopt a New Urban Agenda.


  1. By 2050 the world urban population is expected to nearly double, making urbanization one of the 21st century’s most transformative trends. As the population, economic activities, social and cultural interactions, as well as environmental and humanitarian impacts, are increasingly concentrated in cities, this poses massive sustainability challenges in terms of housing, infrastructure, basic services, food security, health, education, decent jobs, safety, and natural resources, among others.

Did you happen to catch any of this in the Mainstream Media? Oh, you didn’t? I wonder why? Perhaps it’s because the globalist powers ARE HIDING IT FROM YOU.

Regardless, some people are waking up and fighting back, including the state of Alabama where the “Due Process for Property Rights” Act was passed in their state senate which effectively, results in the first official state ban against Agenda 21.



In any case, this article is merely scratching the surface. Like turning over rocks to expose multitudinous measures of maggots to sunlight, in order to leave no stone unturned it would require a series of articles or perhaps, an encyclopedic series of books.

For example, there have been many reports of ghost cities in China. Some claim, including the author quoted above, Pat Wood, that over 100 million Chinese farmers will soon be moved into these urban developments by military force and in accordance with the Agenda 21 endgame. People must also realize that American politicians are, in fact, surrendering U.S. cites like Detroit and Flint, Michigan to the United Nations over water rights.

But above all, everyone must understand the Globalist Agenda for the 21st century definitely transcends mere climate change. Its goals are to create extreme energy deprivation in order to manipulate entire populations; oversee the total loss of freedom within sovereign nations; to maintain and expand the Orwellian surveillance state towards the establishment of a global scientific dictatorship; and to execute the complete collapse of all national borders.

In the Hunger Games series, the name of the tyrannical President of Panem was, Coriolanus Snow, who was superbly portrayed in the films by Donald Sutherland. President Snow had some advice when it comes to controlling the masses. He said:

 Hope is the only thing stronger than fear. A little hope is effective, a lot of hope is dangerous. Spark is good too as long as it is contained.

This is the real strategy behind Agenda 21: Deception. By misleading people into believing the initiative is to benefit the future generations of mankind, it gives them hope. But, in truth, those behind U.N. Agenda 21 want to reduce world population. As the British public speaker, journalist, governmental advisor and former political candidate, Lord Monckton, once said regarding Agenda 21:

to achieve such high levels of population reduction, it means that a lot of people are going to have to die.

So what can be done? Perhaps the best plan of action is for those who are awake to continue in their efforts to inform those unaware. And for those who refuse to arise from their slumber? Or, even worse, what of those who wish to embrace the deception as they enjoy the elevator music during their descent into the damnable and dreadful depths of hell? Well, step right up.

Come to the big city and try your luck in the rigged casino. It’s a roll of the dice but you can’t win if you don’t play. It’s your chance to win tiny houses with smart meters, smart appliances and smart cars.

Place your bets ladies and gentlemen, lay your cards on the table and let the chips fall where they may. This is your last chance to win economic salvation in the form of a poker chip-sized, carbon footprint. The dealers will take your diamonds, beat you with clubs, break your hearts and swindle you in spades, but pay no mind. You are moving Forward with Lady Luck and she’ll never let you cheat as she rakes in your votes, and your wealth, with a creepy-clown smile.

Of course, any slick card player will tell you winning hands are more skill than luck. Like master builders raising the “stack and pack” efficiency apartments of a dystopian future, or technocrats placing political puzzle pieces together for a global scientific dictatorship; the players of the round tables build their winning hands on solid foundations of deceit which leaves very little to chance. After all, card sharks make their own luck.

So, to the very end, play the cards you’re dealt and know the odds are never in your favor. The Aces have stacked the deck and are doubling down. It’s a game of high stakes political blackjack run by Kings and where Lady Luck might soon be Queen. But always beware the Jokers. For the Jokers are wild. It’s why the odds favor the house.

3 thoughts on “Hunger for the Blackjack Agenda

  1. We can use These mind-benders’ propaganda against them. Use theither books and movies against them. I noticed a long time ago that often, the very villains and villainous tyrants in their stories, were of their own operatives. The “bad” guys work for “bad” institutions but they are the very ones they plan to implement.

    Panem is an example. Another example of their psy-prop is the movie Mannequin. In an illusionist type trick, the focus is on the guy and his romance with the likened Mannequin. But there was a “supporting character” called “Hollywood” who was a funny, caricatures gay man. This was a step in the guided evolution of the theatrical homosexual to come through stages. A wise counselor as best friend, then central characters (“Philadelphia”, never watched it, never will). And now every series has to have one. Oh, and references to homosexual pairings as marriages now. And white males are the stupidest characters, the clueless, and see the recent series and movies, the boss of the most kick-ass special forces teams are turning out to be women.

    The public is not readied yet, but soon we will have a James Bond type or super hero male gay. Uh oh, trainees too.

    They have an army of human robots programmed now to accept mindware modifications. We must release them from the mind lock using the various tools as much as possible. This use of the Matrix lesson is one, another is lobbing their own stink words back at them like we did with “fake news”. Another is to throw our own truth stinks like using words that point to outed events, subterfuges like Mockingbird Media, Jekyll Island, Doublespeak, Newspeak, MK Ultra, Operation Paperclip, Jeffrey Epstein, Gulf of Tonkin resolution, USS Liberty, Soros, Rockefeller Foundation, Tides, Verona Papers, Echelon, Al Gore’s Carnivore.

    Coordination among media is easy to show in things like the collage of the spring in the Ease Bunny’s step. You gotta ask about the Big Media saying the same thing in unanimity so much. They agree so much, beyond reason.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s