April 4, 2017
Staying true to form, the same presidential administration that weaponized the Internal Revenue Service against its political opponents earlier this decade, has now been discovered to have utilized former National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, to, most recently, illegally “unmask” members of the Trump Administration in order to provide their names to the mainstream media in efforts to politically undermine the incoming presidential team.
Rice, coincidently, is the same woman who lied to the national media on multiple occasions by blaming the September 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya on a YouTube video.
On April 3, 2017, in response to an initial report by the journalist and author, Mike Cernovich, both Bloomberg and Fox News confirmed the identity of Obama’s former National Security Advisor, Rice, as the culprit who feloniously “unmasked” the identity of those within President Donald Trump’s Administration for the purposes of political expediency, while under the guise of foreign surveillance.
According to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova:
Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides
the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.
Although Rice has denied allegations that she “prepared” spreadsheets of Trump’s transition staff whose identities were obtained under “incidental surveillance”, the Daily Caller claims she did not deny that she “ordered” the spreadsheets to be produced and, that:
her [Rice’s] denial would come as quite a surprise to the government officials who have reviewed dozens of those spreadsheets.
Regarding former president Obama, Rice also verified that:
…the president requested the compliation of the intelligence, which was ultimately provided in January .
The illegal actions of Susan Rice, while operating at the behest of former President Obama in order to politically undermine the Trump Administration’s transition to power; now appears to have been the cause behind Trump’s first National Security Advisor pick, Michael Flynn, to step down over illicit media leaks of Flynn’s phone conversations with Russian Ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak.
The actions by Rice may have also made clear the motive behind an unprecedented action that was taken by President Obama in the final days of his presidency.
According to a January 12, 2017 report in the New York Times:
In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.
The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.
In spite of the recent extraordinary revelations regarding the unparalleled historical actions taken by Rice and the Obama Administration, which may even surpass former President Nixon’s Watergate scandal by magnitudes exceeding tenfold; the five corporations comprising the Mainstream Media immediately began a massive conspiracy of concealment.
Mike Cernovich, the aforementioned journalist who first broke the revelations regarding Rice, made the following claims regarding the story:
Bloomberg had it and the New York Times had it but they wouldn’t run it because they don’t want to run any stories that would make Obama look bad or that will vindicate Trump. They only want to run stories that make Trump look bad so that’s why they sat on it.
Seemingly in line with previous reports on how “Obama’s White House weaponized” the media against Trump, The Washington Post, on April 4, 2017, the day after Former National Security Advisor Rice’s story broke, refused to run any reports on the “unmasking” allegations and, instead, ran an article on Trump’s “chaotic presidency”.
Although some mainstream media outlets have released articles attempting to explain how Rice’s actions were legal, they did not address the illegality of the U.S. intelligence community’s collusion in the leaking of former National Security Advisor, Mike Flynn’s, name to the press.
Neither are any reports being made throughout the mainstream media regarding Susan Rice’s March 2017 interview on PBS News Hour, where she originally denied any knowledge, whatsoever, regarding the “unmasking” of those on Trump’s transition team.
Unsurprisingly, since Rice’s lips were moving, her lies contradict the statements of Dr. Evelyn Farkas, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under Obama, who has acknowledged the dissemination of incidental surveillance on Trump and his aides.
Given what we know now about Rice, the actual surveillance on Trump, the subsequent leaks to the press, and the recent reporting by the mainstream media; other comments made by Dr. Farkas last fall in Warsaw, Poland, may now have new meaning.
On October 26, 2016, at the Warsaw Security Forum’s Plenary Session entitled “The US Global Leadership: What to expect at November 8?”, Farkas stated the following (see the 10 minute, 54-second mark of this video):
And actually, if Donald Trump were elected I believe he’d be impeached pretty quickly or somebody else would have to take over government, and I’m not even joking.
Farkas sure seemed confident at that time. Why?
Well, based upon the November 7, 2016, Heat Street article by the reporter Louise Mensch; in addition to the “October 12, 2016, rumors of a FISA warrant” obtained by the “FBI’s counter-intelligence arm”, it appears the warrant:
was granted in connection with the investigation of suspected activity between the [Trump Tower] server and two banks, SVB Bank and Alfa Bank. However, it is thought in the intelligence community that the warrant covers any ‘US person’ connected to this investigation, and thus covers Donald Trump and at least three further men who have either formed part of his campaign or acted as his media surrogates.
What, then, did former President Obama, his National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas, know?
When did they know it?
Enquiring minds want to know.